The Annual Frontier Report · 2026

Benchmarking the future of PeaceTech

The inaugural benchmark report on frontier technologies serving peace and humanity.

“Every generation of technology arrives with a promise of peace and a capacity for harm. This one is no different — except that the choice between the two is being made right now, and mostly by default.”

Vast sums flow into technologies of war; comparatively little flows in the opposite direction — technologies designed from the outset to save lives, protect human dignity, prevent violence, and rebuild trust. That is PeaceTech, and this report is its annual benchmark.

What it draws on

This inaugural 2026 edition draws on almost five years of the Kluz Prize for PeaceTech, together with extensive desk research, the Prize’s ongoing scan of the field, and Kluz Ventures’ investment experience.

500+
applications from innovators
82
countries represented
9
frontier trends
100+
PeaceTech use cases catalogued

The nine frontier trends

01

From analytic AI to agentic AI
AI that acts, not just predicts.

02

From single machines to autonomous and swarm robotics
Coordinated fleets, not lone units.

03

From satellite data to space infrastructure and services
From observing Earth to enabling peace from space.

04

From “more data” to trustworthy data
Reliable, legitimate, safe data.

05

From classical to quantum-era assumptions
Quantum security and sensing.

06

From digital-only to biosecurity
Biology as a peace-and-conflict domain.

07

From monitoring conflict to verifying restraint
Technology that makes agreements credible.

08

From technology for resource security to conflict prevention
Tech where scarcity drives violence.

09

From vulnerable systems to resilient critical infrastructure
Essential systems that keep working under pressure.

The Peace Dividend Test

The defining characteristic of PeaceTech is not technological sophistication but measurable societal benefit. A genuine PeaceTech application should demonstrate a credible peace dividend — a concrete contribution to one or more of the following:

  • Saving lives — helping to reduce death and injury in conflict and crisis
  • Preventing violence — heading off escalation before it turns lethal
  • Protecting civilians — shielding non-combatants and the displaced from harm
  • Reducing human suffering — easing the humanitarian toll of conflict
  • Strengthening humanitarian response — making relief faster, safer, and better-coordinated
  • Rebuilding trust — restoring the relationships and institutions conflict destroys
  • Strengthening resilient societies — hardening the systems on which peaceful life depends
  • Safeguarding human dignity — keeping the human person at the centre of every application
  • Ethical oversight — using independent, multi-stakeholder mechanisms to ensure ongoing accountability

To separate a real peace dividend from a marketed one, every technology should be able to answer five questions:

  • Outcome — What measurable peace outcome does it create?
  • Beneficiary — Who benefits — and who is excluded?
  • Measurement — How will that impact be measured over time?
  • Evidence — What evidence supports the claim today?
  • Net effect — Could misuse outweigh the expected benefit?

Read the report

The full report covers the nine trends in depth with real-world use cases, the investment case, a risk–opportunity matrix, and a look ahead to PeaceTech in 2035.

Kluz Prize for PeaceTech

Stay Engaged

Sign up to receive updates on the Kluz Prize for PeaceTech, upcoming opportunities, and future events.

Join Now →